Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kempa v. United Services Automobile Association
as 2:2022cv12614
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEMPA
Cross Claimant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cross Defendant:
ESSENTIAL SPINE INTERVENTIONS, PLLC, Alliance Anesthesia, PLLC, CHESTERFIELD FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Marchek v. United Services Automobile Association
as 1:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marchek
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfield Group v. Breslow
as 2:2019cv11653
Plaintiff:
Westfield Group
Defendant:
Aaron Zimmerman Breslow and United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lyons et al v. Just Energy Michigan Corp. et al
as 5:2016cv10110
Defendant:
Just Energy Michigan Corp. and United Services Automobile Association
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Lyons
Intervenor_plaintiff:
St. John Macomb-Oakland Hospital and Synergy Spine and Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodenhouse Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv01107
Defendant:
Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Hanover American Insurance Company, The, Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Professional Finish, Inc., Lantagne's Auto Body, LLC, Bernardi & Judge Corp. a Michigan corporation doing business as Berkley Collision, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Dixon v. Landarte et al
as 2:2014cv12658
Plaintiff:
Joycelyn Dixon
Defendant:
1808396 Ontario Ltd , Camilo Landarte and United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Services Automobile Association v. Broan-Nutone, LLC
as 1:2009cv13178
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association
Defendant:
Broan-Nutone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
