Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Conklin et al v. The United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv07122
Plaintiff:
Tad E Conklin, Manuel Andrade, Linsey I Betts and others
Defendant:
The United States Postal Service
Beverly v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2020cv06402
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ms. Aisha Beverly
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Aisha Beverly
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Roberson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2020cv00197
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Shawna Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Ray v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2019cv06546
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Moore v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv09967
Defendant:
Aida Santana-Putter, Patricia Henry, Jennifer Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Murdise Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase Morris v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2018cv01920
Plaintiff:
Cherlene Chase Morris
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2016cv02794
Defendant:
National Association of Letter Carriers and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Robert Payton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv03621
Plaintiff:
Steve Jones
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Licata v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robert Licata
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Genkos v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2014cv01253
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A. Genkos
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Steven King and Lance Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
