Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Irby v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv00626
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Andee Irby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
In Re: Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Petition for Adjudication by National Labor Relations Board and United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv01207
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cordova v. United States Postal Service Driver et al
as 1:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
David Cordova
Defendant:
United States Postal Service Driver and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castillo v. Durham School Services LP et al
as 1:2012cv01040
Plaintiff:
Joseph Castillo
Defendant:
Durham School Services LP, City of Albuquerque and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franco v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Franco
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hambly v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2011cv00320
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hambly
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Valdivieso v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2009cv01220
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Valdivieso
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, John E. Potter and David King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
