Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Scott et al v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott and Herbie Rhine
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Holley v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2011cv01390
Plaintiff:
Phillip Holley
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Grandjean et al v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Grandjean , Bruce McCartha and Ethel Teeter
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phan et al v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
Quincie Minh-Quyen Phan and Jeffery Miller
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wilson v. Oklahoma City, City of et al
as 5:2010cv00339
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
Oklahoma City, City of, Oklahoma County of, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hammer et al v. Hammer et al
as 5:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Sam Hammer, Jr and Carolyn Hammer
Defendant:
Sam Hammer, Jr and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
McKnight v. Mills et al
as 6:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Amy McKnight
Defendant:
Ronnie J. Mills and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by Federal Agency as Prerequisite; Evidence
Mallett v. Taylor et al
as 5:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Mallett
Defendant:
Jeffrey Paul Taylor, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Adams v. United States Postal Service
as 5:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Barbara A Adams
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
