Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Branshaw
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Whitney Branshaw
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545 Action to Recovery Money
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium v. Becerra et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kodiak Area Native Association v. Becerra et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Kodiak Area Native Association
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and United States of America
Arctic Slope Native Association v. Becerra et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arctic Slope Native Association
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and United States of America
Baum v. USA
as 3:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Robert Baum
Defendant:
Ralph Beistline and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc. v. United States Seafoods, LLC
as 3:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sompo Japan Insurance Inc.
Defendant:
United States Seafoods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ketchikan Indian Community v. Cochran et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Norris Cochran, Elizabeth Fowler and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Ketchikan Indian Community
Metlakatla Indian Community v. Azar et al
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, United States of America and RADM Michael D Weahkee
Plaintiff:
Metlakatla Indian Community
United States of America v. Hill
as 3:2019cv00280
Defendant:
Royal T Hill, Sr and Royal T Hill, Sr doing business as Royal Charters and Tours
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
