Cases 1 - 10 of 36
O'Hara v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Steven F. O'Hara
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense, United States Army and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States of America v. Bell
as 6:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny T Bell and Danny T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howell v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
James Paul Howell
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sintali v. United States Army
as 2:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rahman Sintali
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Smith v. Cadle et al
as 3:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Carmen Bishop, Joseph M. Hood, Kyle Trimble and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Smith
Petitioner:
Patrick Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shehan v. Federal Judge, David Bunning et al
as 2:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Federal Judge, David Bunning, Federal Officials 1 through 5, Federal Judge, Susan Dlott and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Shehan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
