Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Kurtz v. Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
T Kurtz
Defendant:
Broome County's Northern District of The United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estep v. United States of America (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00405
Petitioner:
Jessup Lee Estep
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clay v. Pingatore et al
as 1:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Gary Lebron Clay
Defendant:
K Pingatore, T Brewer, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00153
Petitioner:
Michael E Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duncan v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
James D Duncan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garland v. United States of America (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00387
Petitioner:
Melvin Garland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Salazar v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
Sue Ann Salazar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marlow v. United States Marshal Service
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel S Marlow
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jason Dean Borden
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
