Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Phillips, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-4067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERLIN SCOTT PHILLIPS, VICKIE PARKS, S&V PHILLIPS DEVELOPMENT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SCOTT SPELLMON, JAMES HANDURA and others
Save The Colorado, et al v. United States, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SAVE THE POUDRE: POUDRE WATERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MUNICIPAL SUBDISTRICT, NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COLORADO and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Hunter v. EPA, et al
as 19-5055
Not Yet Classified:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICKEY JAMES, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL MIKE HUNTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma
Evans v. Horton
as 19-3023
Respondent / Appellee:
CAROLINE HORTON, Colonel, United States Army Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK EVANS
Chamber of Commerce, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Pruitt v. EPA, et al
as 16-5039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. E. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Gray v. Gray
as 16-3038
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD A. GRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES GRAY, Colonel United States Army Commandant, USDA - Fort Leavenworth
Chamber of Commerce of the U.S, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-9552
Petitioner:
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA, TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
State of Oklahoma, ex rel., et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-9551
Petitioner:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. and E. SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GINA MCCARTHY, official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 14-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
