Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stuhr et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2023cv03357
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stuhr, Sarah Legare Stuhr, Edward Thomas Legare and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, LTC Andrew Johannes, Christine Wormuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District et al
as 2:2022cv02727
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, Charleston Waterkeeper and South Carolina Wildlife Federation
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, LTC Andrew Johannes, LTG Scott A. Spellmon and others
Petitioner:
Tract 1 Timber, LLC, Seven Sticks, LLC, Tract 7, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2017cv03412
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District , Jeffrey S Palazzini , Todd T Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Coastal Conservation League et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 4:2016cv03008
Plaintiff:
Coastal Conservation League and South Carolina Wildlife Federation
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District , Todd T Semonite , Matthew Luzzatto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
South Carolina Coastal v. United States Army Corp
as 14-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Charleston District, SA JOHN M. MCHUGH, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the US Army, LTG THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and others
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2013cv01543
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, Edward Chamberlayne, John M McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Deerfield Plantation Phase II- v. United States Army Corp
as 11-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEERFIELD PLANTATION PHASE II-B PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON DISTRICT, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers, US Army Corps of Engineers, TREY JORDAN, Lieutenant Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, US Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District and others
City of North Charleston v. SC State Ports Authority et al
as 2:2011cv02040
Plaintiff:
City of North Charleston
Defendant:
SC State Ports Authority , SC Department of Commerce , SC Department of Public Railways and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Deerfield Plantation Phase II-B Property Owners Association Inc v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 4:2009cv01023
Plaintiff:
Deerfield Plantation Phase II-B Property Owners Association Inc and Deerfield Plantation Phase II-B Property Owners Association Inc
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District, Robert L Van Antwerp, Trey Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District et al
as 2:2007cv03802
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, Robert L Van Antwerp and Trey Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
