Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Sanchez et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2023cv01698
Plaintiff: Victor Sanchez, Angelina Sanchez and Ubaldo Sanchez an individual Doing business as Strathmore Ag Supply
Defendant: Friant Water Authority, United States Bureau of Reclamation and Tulare County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01814
Plaintiff: Hoopa Valley Tribe
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Petitioner: Non-Party Westlands Water District, Non-Party Panoche Water District and Non-Party San Luis Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00706
Plaintiff: Planning and Conservation League, Center for Biological Diversity and Restore The Delta
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation and United States Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00959
Plaintiff: South Delta Water Agency, California Water Impact Network, Central Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, United States Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Pestmaster Services, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02120
Defendant: Pestmaster Services, Inc., Jeffrey M. Van Diepen, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: E. & J. Gallo Winery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Pestmaster Services, Inc., a California corporation et al
as 2:2019at01007
Plaintiff: E. & J. Gallo Winery
Defendant: Jeffrey M. Van Diepen, Pestmaster Services, Inc., a California corporation and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
North Coast Rivers Alliance et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2016at00161
Plaintiff: North Coast Rivers Alliance , California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00307
Plaintiff: North Coast Rivers Alliance , California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior and United States Bureau of Reclamation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al
as 2:2015at00641
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , California Water Impact Network, AquAlliance and others
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation, Sally Jewell, THOMAS HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00912
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , California Water Impact Network , AquAlliance and others
Defendant: United States Bureau of Reclamation , Sally Jewell , Thomas Howard and others
Unknown: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
Intervenor_defendant: Westlands Water District , Oakdale Irrigation District and South San Joaquin Irrigation District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?