Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al., v. Glaser et al
as 2:2011cv02980
Defendant:
Donald R. Glaser , United States Bureau of Reclamation and San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority
Plaintiff:
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations , California Sportfishing Protection Alliance , Friends of the River and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2011at00343
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2011cv00952
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Save San Francisco Bay Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2010at00181
Plaintiff:
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority, Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al
as 2:2010cv00357
Plaintiff:
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority, Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_defendant:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
People of the State of California Ex Rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 3:2009cv02233
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California Ex Rel. Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District and County of Imperial
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Ken Salazar, United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2009at00739
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce, Gary Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 1:2009cv01625
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Department of Commerce, Gary Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Oakdale Irrigation District et al v. US Dept of Commerce et al
as 1:2009cv01580
Plaintiff:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Oakdale Irrigation District, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Gary F. Locke, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
