Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pavalone v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 3:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 2:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AIR COMBAT COMMAND , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER v. UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND et al
as 2:2012cv04020
Plaintiff:
SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STRATEGIC COMMAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and UNITED STATES GLOBAL STRIKE COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Pavalone v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 3:2011cv01448
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Pavalone
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, United States Department Of Justice and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRUBE, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2010cv01588
Plaintiff:
STRUBE, INC.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ROBERT M. GATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Afalava et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2009cv02244
Plaintiff:
Roy G. Afalava, Stephen Asper, Walter Campbell and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Robert M. Gates, New Cumberland Defense Logistic Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quiles v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 1:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
Eloy Quiles
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
