Cases 1 - 10 of 197
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 17-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY, DARPA and others
HUNTER v. U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT et al
as 7:2017cv00169
Petitioner:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Respondent:
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Haji Mohammed, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5266
Petitioner - Appellee:
Haji Wali Mohammed, Detainee and Hadaya Morafa, As next friend of Haji Wali Mohammed
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Army Brigadier General, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Wali Morafa, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5225
Petitioner - Appellant:
Wali Mohammed Morafa, Detainee
Petitioner - Appellee:
Hadaya Morafa, As next friend of Wali Mohammed Morafa
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Army Brigadier General, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Hamid Razak, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5074
Petitioner - Appellant:
Hamid Al Razak, Detainee
Petitioner - Appellee:
Bisher Al Rawi, As next friend of Hamid Al Razak
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Army Brigadier General, Commander Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5012
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 16-5011
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, Ashton B. Carter, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Peter J. Clarke, Navy Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5299
Petitioner - Appellee:
Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc., Associated Press and others
Jihad Dhiab, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5276
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jihad Dhiab, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Shaker Aamer, as Next Friend of Jihad Dhaib
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Rear Admiral, Commander, Joint Task Force-GTMO and others
Adil Bin Al Wirghi, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5176
Petitioner - Appellant:
Adil Bin Muhammad Al Wirghi, Detainee and Tawiss Bint Hasan Al Wirghi, as next friend of Adil bin Muhammad al Wirghi
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Chuck Hagel, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Richard W. Butler, Army Brigadier General, Commander, Joint Task Force and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
