Other Statutes Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 102
State of Kansas ex rel Kobach, et al v. U.S. Department of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-3097
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAC AND FOX NATION OF MISSOURI IN KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA, CITY OF MULVANE, KANSAS and others
BP America Production Company v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 0:2021cv00105
Respondent: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director, Kimbra Davis and others
Petitioner: BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Citizens for A Healthy Community et al v. United States Department of Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01268
Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians, Wilderness Workshop, High Country Conservation Advocates and others
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, United States Forest Service, United States Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4231 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2021cv00056
Respondent: United States Department of Interior Secretary, Bureau of Land Management Acting Director, Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Acting Director and others
Petitioner: State of Wyoming
Intervenor: Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae: Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Rocky Mountain Wild v. United States BLM, et al
as 21-1071
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, a federal agency and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, a federal agency
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, INC., a Colorado non-profit corporation
High Lonesome Ranch v. United States
as 21-1055
Not Yet Classified: THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH, LLC, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency, the Bureau of Land Managment, a division of the United States Department of Interior and others
Western Energy Alliance v. Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Respondent: United States of America President, United States Acting Secretary of Interior, Scott De La Vega and others
Petitioner: Western Energy Alliance, Petroleum Association of Wyoming and State of Wyoming
Intervenor: Conservation Colorado, Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project and others
Amicus Curiae: Western Leaders Network
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
High Lonesome Ranch v. Board of County Commissioner, et al
as 21-1020
Appellant: THE HIGH LONESOME RANCH, LLC
Not Yet Classified: THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE COUNTY OF GARFIELD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency, the Bureau of Land Managment, a division of the United States Department of Interior
Audubon of Kansas, Inc. v. United States Department of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02025
Defendant: Michael Beam, United States Department of Interior, David Bernhardt and others
Plaintiff: Audubon of Kansas, Inc.
Petitioner: Big Bend Groundwater Management District No. 5
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8073
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EARTHWORKS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Respondent: WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE COUNCILS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, MICHAEL D. NEDD, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Petitioner: STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, INDEPENDANT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?