Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clifton v. United States Department of Justice, et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Dominique Clifton
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, Regina Lombardo, United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019at00154
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, FBI Christopher Wray, United States and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe #1 et al v. United States et al
as 1:2019cv00270
Defendant:
Bureau of A.T.F. & E, United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe #5, Jane Roe #1, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(PS) Devore v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2018cv02487
Defendant:
BINJ Laboratories, Eugene Tu, Michael Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Devore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 2:2015cv01664
Plaintiff:
Tanya Grace McDaniel
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Davis Police Department, David Pendrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryson v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
William Mack Bryson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney for the District of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Esperanza Reyes v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2012cv01749
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Reyes
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2012cv01327
Plaintiff:
Porcha Neal
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
