Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00113
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00088
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00089
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00086
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00085
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Karim v. Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2008cv00065
Petitioner:
Torko Abdul Karim
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice and CCA Stewart Detention Center
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lee v. Hudson et al
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wayne Lee
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Other Unnamed Federal Correctional Officers, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00196
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Starling v. United States Department of Justice
as 5:2007cv00466
Plaintiff:
Edward Starling
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
