Contract Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
David Jacobs, et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3794
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID JACOBS and GARY HINDES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, IN ITS CAPACITY AS CONSERVATOR OF THE FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and others
KOTHAPALLI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
as 2:2017cv13168
Plaintiff: SIRISHA KOTHAPALLI
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KOTHAPALLI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
as 3:2017cv13168
Plaintiff: SIRISHA KOTHAPALLI
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF FISCAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. UNITED STATES DEPATRMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv03915
Plaintiff: MARK I. SMITH and CHARLES SHOEMAKER
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. THE ESTATE OF LEONARD M. SCHNEIDER et al
as 2:2012cv04555
Plaintiff: BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: THE ESTATE OF LEONARD M. SCHNEIDER, ANNA WISZYNSKI, RANDY J. SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Type: Contract Insurance
FIRST CHOICE BANK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2010cv03415
Plaintiff: FIRST CHOICE BANK
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE , UB HOLDING L.L.C., STEPHEN VITA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?