Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Regan v. United States of America et al
as 7:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Marine Corps Installations East-Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of the Navy and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, ex rel., Michael S. Regan, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality and Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
State of North Carolina, ex rel. et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv00016
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, ex rel., Michael S. Regan and North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality
Defendant:
United States Marine Corps, United States Department of the Navy, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Carolina Power & Light Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2009cv00190
Defendant:
The Holladay Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Company, Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Power & Light Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
