Cases 11 - 20 of 28
MOREIRA-QUIJIJE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
as 1:2017cv05756
Petitioner:
EDISON IVAN MOREIRA-QUIJIJE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RUIZ-ACOSTA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
as 1:2017cv03675
Plaintiff:
SANTOS RUIZ-ACOSTA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUPONT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv07846
Plaintiff:
VERCY DUPONT, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv02242
Petitioner:
STEPHEN THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CAMDEN NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FARMER v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2015cv06703
Petitioner:
LEROY S FARMER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02499
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
