Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01473
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pettit v. United States District Court et al
as 2:2016cv01201
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Pettit
Defendant:
United States District Court and Utah Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Johnson, et al
as 16-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON EARL COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, United States District Court of New Mexico, JACOB ALAN WISHARD, U.S. Attorney, MICHAEL DAVID NAMMAR and others
Coleman v. United States District Court, et al
as 16-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON EARL COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO, WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, DAMON P. MARTINEZ and others
Coleman v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Vernon Earl Coleman
Defendant:
United States District Court, William P. Johnson, Damon P. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. United States District Court
as 5:2015cv03013
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beadles v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv03127
Plaintiff:
Tramaine Beadles
Defendant:
United States of America and United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. United States District Courts et al
as 1:2014cv01031
Petitioner:
Tony James Dewayne Miller
Respondent:
United States District Courts and United States District Judge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Guy v. LNU et al
as 1:2014cv00190
Plaintiff:
Richard Gene Guy
Defendant:
FNU LNU, Susana Martinez, American Embassy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
