Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Atherholt v. PA Public Utility Commission et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Samantha L. Atherholt
Defendant:
PA Public Utility Commission and The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
ZIMMERMAN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv04537
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
ZIMMERMANN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv03512
Plaintiff:
E EDWARD ZIMMERMANN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ZIMMERMANN v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMAN and E. EDWARD ZIMMERMANN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
ELLERBE v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2014cv05041
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Foglia v. Renal Ventures Management
as 12-4050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS FOGLIA, In the Name of the United States Government pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. Section 3730; the State of New Jersey False Claims Act, Title 2A of the New jersey Statutes and amending 3 P.L. 1968, C. 413; The State of Texas pursuan
Defendant - Appellee:
RENAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT
Charles Lobel v. Express Scripts Inc
as 09-1047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LOBEL, Individually and in THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT, 31 U.S.C., SECTION 3730
Defendant - Appellee:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS INC
KOCH et al v. BI INCORPORATED
as 1:2008cv00148
Plaintiff:
KEVIN KOCH , NANCY ZOOK , DANIEL BRAUN and others
Defendant:
BI INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
