Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2011cv02356
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Southeastern Newspaper Company, LLC v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Newspaper Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Derrick B Jackson
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Van Peavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jeannie L Cosby
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. United States Marshall Services et al
as 2:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Andrew N Cox
Defendant:
United States Marshall Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Britt et al
as 5:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Alicia C Gordon, Alicia C Gordon, Chad E Gordon and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Thomas Britt, United States Marshal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jackson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00044
Petitioner:
Derrick B Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. United States Marshal Service
as 5:2009cv00024
Petitioner:
Derrick B Jackson
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
