Cases 11 - 20 of 21
William Mercer v. USA, et al
as 12-30859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MERCER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, W. A. SHERROD, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
William Mercer v. USA, et al
as 12-30774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MERCER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, W. A. SHERROD, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
William Mercer v. USA, et al
as 12-30762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MERCER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, W. A. SHERROD, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
William Mercer v. USA, et al
as 12-30599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MERCER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, W. A. SHERROD, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Oser v. United States Penitentiary Pollock
as 1:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
William C Oser
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Pollock, Cartrette and Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Clifton v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-30994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE CLIFTON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, GERALDO MALDONDO, JOE KEFFER and others
Victor Baxter v. USP Pollock
as 11-30194
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR G. BAXTER
Respondent - Appellee:
W. A. SHERROD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Pollock
David Taylor v. Warden U.S. Pentry Pollock
as 11-30026
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID W TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLOCK
Marino v. Sherrod et al
as 1:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino
Defendant:
W A Sherrod, Warden of United States Penitentiary Pollock, U S Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. United States Penitentiary Pollock
as 1:2010cv01444
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Defendant:
Warden of United States Penitentiary Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
