Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
DURU v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv03017
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv01426
Plaintiff:
CHARMANE SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02262
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CARROLL, TERESA RICHARDSON, AIDA ZARGAS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, LOUIS DEJOY and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) et al
as 1:2018cv01583
Defendant:
PAUL J. MCNULTY, JAMES G. ROCHE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv02855
Plaintiff:
LEONARDO RAMOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PROCTOR v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv01413
Plaintiff:
XARION R. PROCTOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and MELVIN CAMMONS, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
