Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Blum et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01595
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, AD UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BLUM and GAIL BLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated et al
as 1:2017cv05719
Defendant:
Michael J. Rodriguez and United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Tarik Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rothman et al v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv07618
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rothman , Joel Mandel , Michael Wise and others
Defendant:
United States Tennis Association Incorporated , Gordon Smith , Staciellen Mischel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'Loughlin v. USTA Player Development Incorporated et al
as 7:2014cv02194
Plaintiff:
Natalie O'Loughlin
Defendant:
USTA Player Development Incorporated and United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Counter_claimant:
USTA Player Development Incorporated and United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Counter_defendant:
Natalie O'Loughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Tennis Association Incorporated v. VSW Productions LLC et al
as 7:2013cv04124
Plaintiff:
United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Defendant:
VSW Productions LLC , M&M Films, Inc., Maiken Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Simmons v. United States Tennis Association Incorporated
as 7:2007cv02046
Plaintiff:
Jerel M. Simmons
Defendant:
United States Tennis Association Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
