Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Perez v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00229
Petitioner:
Thomas Perez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tsuhako v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv03077
Petitioner:
Jorge E. Tsuhako
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lovings v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00214
Petitioner:
Jennifer Lovings
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adviento v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00224
Petitioner:
Dana Adviento
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ritchison v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00203
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ritchison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clark v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00206
Petitioner:
Aaron J. Clark
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trujillo v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv03060
Petitioner:
Gustavo Armenta Trujillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muhannad v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00142
Petitioner:
Wa'il Mansur Muhannad
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ceballos v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00081
Petitioner:
Froylan Ceballos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Woods v. United States of America
as 8:2015cv00443
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Eddie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
