Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Tenaris Bay City, Inc. et al v. United States
as 1:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Tenaris Bay City, Inc., Maverick Tube Corporation, IPSCO Tubulars Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
United States Steel Corporation, Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc., PTC Liberty Tubulars LLC and others
SeAH Steel Corporation v. United States
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
SeAH Steel Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. Inc., PTC Liberty Tubulars LLC, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Alcoa USA Corp., et al v. Lynette Kaiser, et al
as 22-8018
Petitioner:
ALCOA USA CORP., RETIREES GROUP BENEFIT PLAN FOR CERTAIN HOURLY EMPLOYEES OF ALCOA USA CORP., MEDICARE EXCHANGE HEALTHCARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN FOR CERTAIN MEDICARE ELIGIBLE RETIREES OF ALCOA and others
Respondent:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, ALUMINUM TRADES COUNCIL OF WENATCHEE, WASHINGTON AFL-CIO and LYNNETTE J. KAISER, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated
Alcoa USA Corp., et al v. Edmond Butch, et al
as 22-8017
Petitioner:
ALCOA USA CORP., RETIREES GROUP BENEFIT PLAN FOR CERTAIN HOURLY EMPLOYEES OF ALCOA USA CORP. and OPTIONAL LIFE INSURANCE PLAN
Respondent:
EDMOND M. BUTCH, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, CHARLES R. WYATT, MARTIN L. ELLISON and others
Qingdao Ge Rui Da Rubber Co., Ltd. v. United States
as 1:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Qingdao Ge Rui Da Rubber Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
United Steel, Paper and Forest v. EPA, et al
as 20-1434
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv02876
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, CHAD WOLF, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC et al v. National Grid et al
as 4:2020cv11491
Plaintiff:
United Steelworkers of America, Local 12003 and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
National Grid and Benefits Committee of National Grid USA Service Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Neighbors for Environmental, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-72091
Petitioner:
NEIGHBORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, HALOGENATED SOLVENTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE, INC and N-METHYLPYRROLIDONE PRODUCERS GROUP, INC
Amicus Curiae:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
United Mine Workers of America, et alIn re: United Mine Workers of America, et al
as 20-1215
In Re:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and In re: United Mine Workers of America International Union
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
