Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00904
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00720
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
McClung v. Sacred Heart University, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00688
Plaintiff: Dylan McClung
Defendant: Sacred Heart University, INC. and Robert Berticci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00381
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hanlon v. Delk et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Amanda R. Hanlon
Defendant: Tyler D. Delk, Jason W. Rinsky and Sacred Heart University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01461
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mikanda v. Wesleyan University et al
as 3:2023cv01373
Plaintiff: Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant: Wesleyan University and U.S. Department of Education
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff: Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?