Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barranco et al v. University of Michigan Board of Regents
as 2:2023cv10646
Plaintiff:
Ross Barranco and Katie Shier
Defendant:
University of Michigan Board of Regents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Deluca v. University of Michigan et al
as 2:2020cv12171
Defendant:
University of Michigan Board of Regents and University of Michigan
Plaintiff:
Thomas Deluca
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
University of Michigan, et alIn re: University of Michigan, et al
as 19-1636
Petitioner:
In re: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN and UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN BOARD OF REGENTS
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
Rebecca Foster v. Univ of Michigan Bd of Regent, et al
as 19-1314
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN BOARD OF REGENTS and ALISON DAVIS-BLAKE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA FOSTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
