Cases 1 - 6 of 6
COMMON CAUSE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02023
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., CHERYL L. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA M. ALEXANDER, ROBERTO AGUIRRE, SHEILA AGUIRRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
LIBBY GARLAND, LUSH COSMETICS LLC, STEVEN RUGGLES and others
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH WARREN, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and RON WYDEN
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al v. FERRIERO
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant:
DAVID S. FERRIERO
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Petitioner:
NEBRASKA, LOUISIANA, ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Not Classified By Court:
LEANNE LITTRELL DILORENZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Free Press, et al v. FCC, et al
as 17-1129
Petitioner:
Free Press, Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc., Prometheus Radio Project and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
ION Media Networks, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
CBS Corporation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 14-1242
Petitioner:
CBS Corporation, Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc., Walt Disney Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
AT&T, Inc.
CBS Corporation, et al v. FCC, et al
as 14-1237
Petitioner:
CBS Corporation, Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc., Walt Disney Company and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
In re: CBS Corporation, et al
as 14-1236
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: CBS Corporation, Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc., Walt Disney Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
