Cases 1 - 10 of 125
BRAZILL v. COTTON et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BRAZILL
Defendant:
COTTON, VIRGINIA LOCKEY and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROY WAYNE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC PHARMACY and UNIVERSITY TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN CELL EXTRACTION TEAM #1 - #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv23986
Plaintiff:
PERCY L HALL
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, CLARK, HINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEFFIELD v. BROWN et al
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
ANDRE L SHEFFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, LEWIS, UNKNOWN CELL EXTRACTION TEAM #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADET v. WHEATON et al
as 3:2023cv17134
Plaintiff:
MIKE CADET
Defendant:
WHEATON, WHITE, BURDETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EZELL v. BROWN et al
as 3:2023cv16487
Plaintiff:
ROB ERIC EZELL
Defendant:
BROWN, THE GEO GROUP, TWO UNKNOWN GEO PRISON GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. GIBBS et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE GIBBS, BATCHELOR, MURRAY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PECCI-ANDUJAR v. PARKER et al
as 3:2023cv12173
Defendant:
J PARKER, A KIRKLAND, AUSTIN GULLETT and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PECCI-ANDUJAR v. PARKER et al
as 5:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
JEAN PECCI-ANDUJAR
Defendant:
J PARKER, A KIRKLAND, AUSTIN GULLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
