Cases 41 - 50 of 2,965
Burrow v. Unknown et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Estrellita Burrow
Defendant:
Unknown and VIA Transit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McLain v. Unknown Officer
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Scott McLain
Defendant:
Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Collier et al
as 9:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Scotty J. Bridges
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Regional Director, Unknown Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 9:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Quendell Taylor
Defendant:
James Davis, Christopher Farrell, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contego Spa Designs, Inc. v. Malibu Nail Lounge et al
as 4:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Contego Spa Designs, Inc.
Defendant:
MALIBU NAIL LOUNGE, an entity of unknown type, and DOES 1-10, Malibu Nail Lounge and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Bryan v. Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, TX.
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ellis James Bryan
Defendant:
Unknown District Attorney of Maverick County, TX.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bridges v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Scotty Bridges
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. West et al
as 9:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Christopher Long
Defendant:
Michelle West, Ashely Homes, Unknown Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
