Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Barber v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Barber
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Southern Mississippi Correctional Institution, Greenwood Restitution Center and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaitanis v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
James Farrell Gaitanis
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Unknown Brewer, Unknown Spotts and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaitanis v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
James F. Gaitanis
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Unknown Brewer, Unknown Spotts and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Hall et al
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff:
Deontra Bowens
Defendant:
Pelicia E. Hall, Unknown Brewer, Unknown Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlandus Hunt
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., S.M.C.I., Unknown Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Brewer
as 1:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlandus Hunt
Defendant:
Unknown Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Raymond T. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
La Tidtus Jones
Defendant:
Ron King , Theresa Seabrook , Hubert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Woodall et al
as 2:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Reginald DeShawn Bradley
Defendant:
Ronald Woodall, Ronald King, Beth Hillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Robert Pratt
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Jermey Bates, Unknown Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
