Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Chisholm v. Portillo et al
as 3:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Tony Chisholm
Defendant:
Warden Hector Portillo, Deputy Warden Unknown Rice, J. Hardeway and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkston v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00301
Defendant:
Unknown Rice, Unit Manager Unknown Nielson or Nelson, Dr. Unknown Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Burkes et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. EMCF et al
as 3:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Merlin Hill
Defendant:
EMCF, Frank Shaw, Unknown Dice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Defendant:
Unknown Ellis, Unknown Williams, Frank Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Hogons et al
as 3:2016cv00973
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Mitchell
Defendant:
N. Hogons, Unknown Strickland, J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beans v. Hogans et al
as 3:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
Antwone Dewayne Beans
Defendant:
Norris Hogans, Lemarcus Ruffin, Unknown Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Shaw et al
as 3:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Corderro Demarcus Kennedy
Defendant:
F. Shaw, Unknown Rice, Q. William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. Abangan et al
as 3:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Unknown Abangan, Unknown Rice, Centurion Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Disciplinary et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Disciplinary, Unknown Dumas, Unknown Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
