Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rutledge v. Woodall
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Mike Rutledge
Defendant:
Unknown Woodall
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venezia v. MDOC Medical Director et al
as 1:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Chad Venezia
Defendant:
MDOC Medical Director, MDOC Medical Provider, Unknown Woodall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Burl Cain, Unknown Woodall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murshid v. Keys et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Cooper, Unknown Keys, Unknown Woodall and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulkhaliq M. Murshid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. M.D.O.C. Contract Monitor et al
as 1:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson
Defendant:
M.D.O.C. Contract Monitor, Centurion Supervisiors of Medical Staff, Unknown Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Woodall et al
as 3:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas Lee
Defendant:
Unknown Woodall and Unknown Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Fisher et al
as 1:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Julius Logan
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Unknown Woodall, Angie Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loftin v. Banks et al
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Bernaldo Parzynski Loftin
Defendant:
J. Banks , M. Turner and Unknown Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Darnell
Defendant:
Uknown Jimenez, Unknown Hardy, Unknown Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Woodall et al
as 1:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronnell Ewing
Defendant:
Unknown Woodall, Unknown Davis, Unknown Megg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
