Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2852
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, Guardian Ad Litem Tiffany Starcevich
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, N. GRANNIS, S FLORY and others
Kennard Davis, et al v. James Walker, et al
as 19-16616
Defendant:
TROY BRIMHALL, V, DUC, R. PENNINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BROWN, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis and RONNIE TOLLIVER, Guardian Ad Litem for Kennard Lee Davis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNARD LEE DAVIS, guardian ad litem Ronnie Tolliver
Defendant / Appellee:
DA ROSA, EDMONSON, S. FLORY and others
Toby Semick v. CDCR, et al
as 17-16090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBY M SEMICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BEARD, M. VOONG and others
Rich v. Stratton, et al.
as 2:2017cv00432
Plaintiff:
Elijah Ray Rich
Defendant:
J. Stratton, J. Agnone, C. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Acosta et al
as 2:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Stewart
Defendant:
E. Acosta and V. Duc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Muniz
as 5:2015cv01916
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. Muniz, Koepinskee, J. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Pam Jones, Damon Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. Muniz et al
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jarbor McElroy
Defendant:
W. L. Muniz, Beard, Pam Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chess v. Bal et al
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Michael Chess
Defendant:
J. Bal, - Anthony, V. Duc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Benyamini v. Sahoota, et al
as 12-16863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. BENYAMINI
Defendant - Appellee:
SAHOOTA, Doctor, CSP-Sacramento, SHAJA MENNOM, Doctor, CSP-Sacramento, CHEN, Doctor, CSP-Sacramento and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
