Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Banks et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jean Bonanno, Bobby J Betton, David Allen Winkfield and others
Defendant:
Occidental Chemical Corporation, Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mattison v. Johnson et al
as 9:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mattison
Defendant:
V. Johnson, Katie Calley and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrasco v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Jose Carrasco
Defendant:
A.J. Annucci, Thomas LaValley, C. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Teeple et al
as 1:2013cv02010
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Matthew Teeple, David T. Riley and John V. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Walker v. Fischer et al
as 9:2010cv01431
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Robert Schattinger, Dale Artus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngblood v. Artus et al
as 9:2010cv00971
Plaintiff:
Andre' Youngblood
Defendant:
D. Artus, Lester Wright, V. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Artus et al
as 9:2010cv00833
Plaintiff:
Andre' Youngblood
Defendant:
D. Artus, Lester Wright, V. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Artus et al
as 9:2010cv00752
Plaintiff:
Andre' Youngblood
Defendant:
D. Artus, Lester N. Wright and V. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Bobowski et al
as 9:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Odom
Defendant:
Casimir Bobowski, A. Hawthorne Lashway, V. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
