Cases 1 - 10 of 35
TOWNES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
DARIAN TOWNES
Defendant:
HEATHER DAVIS and WARDEN/C-T VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townes v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Darian Townes
Defendant:
Heather Davis and Warden/C-T Valdosta State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
as 7:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSTILLER v. SHROPSHIRE et al
as 7:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
JOHN MOSTILLER
Defendant:
WARDEN RALPH SHROPSHIRE, COII MASSEY and VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH MEDICAL, DR MOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEGRIN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 7:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELL PATH MEDICAL, VALDOSTA STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, J. Kevin Perry, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURTIS v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
DEOUNTA DEMETRIUS CURTIS
Defendant:
Nurse NEWSOME, Officer DEWBERRY, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Warden SHAWN EMMONS and VALDOSTA STATE PRISON
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES J HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAKER v. WARD
as 5:2019cv00126
Defendant:
WARDEN SECRETARY TENAKA BROWN, LISA FOUNTAIN, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
