Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TAC v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
CA VAN TAC
Defendant:
Mr. JAMES CAHILL, MUSKET TRANSPORT, LTD. and VFS CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Stewart v. Tajinder Singh Desi et al
as 2:2023cv10853
Plaintiff:
Ashley Stewart
Defendant:
Tajinder Singh Desi, VFS Canada Inc. and Gulfline Group LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lowe v. Campbell et al
as 5:2021cv10502
Defendant:
VFS Canada, Inc., Christopher Andrew Campbell and 890557 Ontario Limited d/b/a Thompson Emergency Freight
Plaintiff:
Kenneth John Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Gilvie v. VFS Canada et al
as 1:2020cv01922
Defendant:
VFS Canada, VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC, Andrey N Zlinskiy and others
Plaintiff:
Cordella Angeline O'Gilvie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Gilvie v. VFS Canada et al
as 1:2020cv03864
Cross Defendant:
VFS Canada and Andrey N Zlinskiy
Defendant:
Volvo Group North America, LLC, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Canada, LTD, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cordella Angeline O'Gilvie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Force v. VFS Canada, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv12026
Defendant:
VFS Canada, Inc. and HL Motor Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patrice Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Crispin et al
as 2:2015cv11742
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Adams
Defendant:
Rene Crispin , Chrysler Group, LLC and VFS Canada, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lumpkin v. Kononov et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Estate_plaintiff:
Darian Lumpkin
Defendant:
Roman Kononov, Scotlynn Investments Inc, Scotlynn Commodities Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sayeduzzaman et al v. Bertha et al
as 1:2007cv02879
Plaintiff:
M.A. Sayeduzzaman and Prashanta Barua
Defendant:
Sylvain Bertha and VFS Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
