Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Kelley v. Royal Industries International, LLC
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Blake Vincent Kelley
Defendant:
Royal Industries International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McDaniels v. Diamondback Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc., Travis D. Stice, Vincent K. Brooks and others
Dudas v. Faricy et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Kristof Dudas
Defendant:
Peter Faricy, Nathaniel Anschuetz, Jonathan Bram and others
Happle v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Katrina Mears, Michael H. Vincent and Tracy Torbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Manuel v. Metzger et al
as 1:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Dana Metzger, Sgt. Vincent May, Todd Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Edwards v. Mercer et al
as 1:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
LaDreana Edwards
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Francois P. Chadwick, Christopher Wendel and others
Nominal Defendant:
Volta, Inc.
Albright et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00849
Plaintiff:
Ty Albright, Patricia Allison, Damaris Andrea and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Abee et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bradford, Kate Brown, Jeremy Abee and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mercurio et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brittany Paul, Deana Redden, Vincent Mercurio and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
