Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Indigenous Peoples v. U.S. Army Corps
as 23-40555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Indigenous Peoples of the Coastal Bend, Karankawa Kadla Tribe of the Texas Gulf Coast and Ingleside on the Bay Coastal Watch Association
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A. Spellmon, Lieutenant General, Christopher G. Beck, Brigadier General and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MODA Ingleside Oil Terminal, L.L.C. and Enbridge Ingleside Oil Terminal, LLC, formerly known as MODA Ingleside Oil Terminal, L.L.C.
Indigenous Peoples of the Coastal Bend et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Indigenous&%23037;20Peoples&%23037;20of&%23037;20the&%23037;20Coastal&%23037;20Bend, Karankawa&%23037;20Kadla&%23037;20Tribe&%23037;20of&%23037;20the&%23037;20Texas&%23037;20Gulf&%23037;20Coast, Ingleside&%23037;20on&%23037;20the&%23037;20Bay&%23037;20Coastal&%23037;20Watch&%23037;20Association and others
Defendant:
U.S.&%23037;20Army&%23037;20Corps&%23037;20of&%23037;20Engineers, Lieutenant General Scott A Spellmon, Brigadier General Christopher G Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Optimus Steel, LLC v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2020cv00374
Defendant:
Jefferson Southern Star Pipeline, LLC, Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite (in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail (in his official capacity as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Galvevston District Commander and others
Plaintiff:
Optimus Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2020cv00460
Defendant:
Brandon W Mobley, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Kenneth N. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club
Petitioner:
Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC and Permian Highway Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
