Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vance Corporation v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Vance Corporation
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Anderson v. Eaton Vance Corporation
as 1:2021cv10436
Plaintiff:
Cherin Anderson
Defendant:
Eaton Vance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Price v. Eaton Vance Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv12098
Defendant:
Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Corporation, Eaton Vance Investment Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Price
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Rutgers Enhanced Insurance Company v. Esty et al
as 1:2010cv11259
Plaintiff:
Rutgers Enhanced Insurance Company
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Esty, Thomas E. Faust, Jr., Allen R. Freedman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Manuszak v. Esty et al
as 1:2010cv11047
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuszak
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Esty, Thomas E. Faust, Jr., Allen R. Freedman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Manuszak v. Esty et al
as 1:2010cv11046
Plaintiff:
Richard Manuszak
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Esty, Thomas E. Faust, Jr., Allen R. Freedman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of: Vance Corporation v. Western Surety Company et al
as 1:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of: Vance Corporation
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, Construction Development Systems and John Brisbin
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of: VANCE CORPORATION v. Western Surety Company et al
as 1:2010at00222
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of: VANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
Western Surety Company, CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS and JOHN BRISBIN
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.