Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lilla v. Federal Gov et al
as 6:2022cv01342
Plaintiff:
Shannan Lilla
Defendant:
Federal Gov, Federal Consumer Burough, FCBP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vanguard Products Group, Inc. v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01451
Defendant:
Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Merchandising Technologies, Inc. v. Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01354
Plaintiff:
Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Brinkman v. Sutz et al
as 3:2010cv00481
Plaintiff:
Edward Brinkman
Defendant:
Floyd Sutz and Vanguard-EMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vanguard Products Group, Inc. et al v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00392
Defendant:
Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Telefonix, Inc. and Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Vanguard Products Group, Inc. et al v. Lynx Innovation, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00870
Plaintiff:
Vanguard Products Group, Inc., Vanguard Products Group, Inc., Vanguard Products Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lynx Innovation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Vanguard Products Group, Inc. et al v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01405
Plaintiff:
Vanguard Products Group, Inc., Vanguard Products Group, Inc., Telefonix, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Merchandising Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.