Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Access Vapor, LLC v. California Grown E Liquids, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv02052
Defendant:
Propaganda E Liquid, LLC, Jeffrey Nelson, California Grown E Liquids, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Access Vapor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Shinjin Vapor LLC v. Bolt USA, LLC
as 4:2020cv05238
Plaintiff:
SHIJIN VAPOR LLC
Defendant:
BOLT USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
May v. Juul Labs Inc et al
as 3:2019cv07679
Defendant:
Meo Inc, E-Juice Vapor Inc, Shenzhen IVPS Technology Corporation LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Landon May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2019md02913
Plaintiff:
Virginia Jose Angullo, Tracie Kugler, M.C. and others
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Holdfast Vapors LLC and others
Interested Party:
Danielle Mason and Matthew Blomquist
Petitioner:
Ethan Cooper, Alex Zike, Javon Clark and others
Special Master:
Thomas J. Perrelli and Honorable Gail A. Andler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nehemiah Kong v. ESS Prisa II LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00937
Defendant:
Does, ESS Prisa II LLC, Kaba-House USA Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nehemiah Kong
DNA Vapor, LLC v. Alloy Blends, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06915
Counter Claimant:
Alloy Blends, LLC
Defendant:
Alloy Blends, LLC, Does and Matthew J Marohnic
Counter Defendant:
DNA Vapor, LLC
Plaintiff:
DNA Vapor, LLC
DNA Vapor, LLC v. The Diamond Group, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05265
Defendant:
Farrah Faye Burbridge, Does and The Diamond Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
DNA Vapor, LLC
Cosmetic Warriors Limited v. Lush Vapor LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Cosmetic Warriors Limited
Defendant:
Lush Vapor LLC and Trang Diem Tran
DNA Vapor, LLC v. Cosmic Fog Vapors LLC
as 8:2016cv02092
Defendant:
Cosmic Fog Vapors LLC
Plaintiff:
DNA Vapor, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
