Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Maegan Elizabeth Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vargas-Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jaceline Vargas-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adler et al v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06513
Plaintiff:
Sabine Adler, Annalisa Barron, Hannah Bauman and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Michael Koerner, Gerald Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Ontaneda et al
as 6:2023cv06077
Plaintiff:
Tyrieke J. Bradley
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Ontaneda, Superintendent Burnett, CO Taddeo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blattenberger et al v. HomeDeliveryLink, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00981
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blattenberger, Eladio Bonilla-Ramos, John Brunson and others
Defendant:
HomeDeliveryLink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Season L Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vargas v. Renzi et al
as 6:2021cv06165
Defendant:
Sergeant Shultz, Cpl Simonelli, Lieutenant Latona and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Vargas v. Colvin
as 6:2017cv06015
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jomayra Torres-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Vargas Dicupe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00903
Petitioner:
Fioldalisa Vargas Dicupe
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Nolan et al
as 6:2016cv06155
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anderson
Defendant:
L. Nolan, A. Vargas, Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
