Cases 1 - 10 of 851
Padilla, et al. v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
as 24-2801
Plaintiff:
YOLANY PADILLA, IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Sanchez-Vasquez v. Garland
as 24-2749
Petitioner:
MISAEL OMAR SANCHEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
John Doe v. Priscilla A. Madrid et al
as 8:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Priscilla A. Madrid, Thomas Vasquez, William Earl Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez-Merida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2597
Petitioner:
GEINER YESICA RODRIGUEZ-MERIDA and BELLALETH ISAYDI VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero-Vasquez v. Garland
as 24-2600
Petitioner:
FAUSTINO ROMERO-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez v. Fast Track Leasing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Vasquez
Defendant:
Fast Track Leasing LLC and Deninson Dugarte Rivas
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Rodas De Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2561
Petitioner:
SONIA ELIZABETH RODAS DE VASQUEZ, DAVID ELEAZAR VASQUEZ RODAS and JORGE ENRIQUE VASQUEZ RODAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2397
Petitioner:
YSABEL VASQUEZ and JOMAR GARCIA-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Vasquez v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-1957
Plaintiff:
JUAN RUBIO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
RACHEL MITCHELL, Maricopa County Attorney and ROSEMARIE PENA-LYNCH, Maricopa County Legal Defense Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
