Cases 21 - 30 of 2,691
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-1957
Plaintiff:
JUAN RUBIO VASQUEZ
Defendant:
RACHEL MITCHELL, Maricopa County Attorney and ROSEMARIE PENA-LYNCH, Maricopa County Legal Defense Attorney
Delgado, et al. v. ILWU-PMA Welfare Plan
as 24-1845
Plaintiff:
ANGELINA BOWEN DELGADO, ROBIN BECERRA, STEVE BOZAN and others
Defendant:
ILWU-PMA WELFARE PLAN, an employee health and welfare plan under he Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Padilla, et al. v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
as 24-1736
Respondent:
YOLANY PADILLA, IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Vasquez Campos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1513
Petitioner:
IRIS MARISOL VASQUEZ CAMPOS and DOUGLAS ENMANUEL IRIAS VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC) Vasquez v. Market Square Bakery Honey Bun Owners
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez
Defendant:
Market Square Bakery Honey Bun Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1424
Petitioner:
RODRIGO VASQUEZ RINCON and LUCIANA GABRIELA VASQUEZ GALVIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez Merida v. Garland
as 24-1347
Petitioner:
DORENA LILY VASQUEZ MERIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vasquez-Calix v. Garland
as 24-1364
Petitioner:
JUNIOR NOEL VASQUEZ-CALIX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
