Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02814
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vasquez v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv02026
Petitioner:
Omar Vasquez
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vasquez-Ixlaj v. Hagan Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01172
Defendant:
Douglas Dejournette, Daniel Floyd Hardison, Charles R. Hagan, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Oseas Vasquez-Ixlaj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seguros R Vasquez, Inc. v. Aguirre et al
as 8:2019cv01484
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE, Chris Aguirre and Mindy Aguirre
Plaintiff:
Seguros R Vasquez, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Alfaro et al v. Gali Service Industries, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03705
Defendant:
FRANCISCO GALI, SR., CORPORATIONS A-D, BOLANA ENTERPRISES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CATALINA VENTURA, WOSUELI YOC GOMEZ, ANA BERTA HERRERA CARINO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
White v. LLPD LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02900
Plaintiff:
Tina White, Michael Garcia Vasquez, Nicole Merchant and others
Defendant:
LLPD LLC and Pete Koroneos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tham v. V.T.A.C. General Contractors, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01314
Plaintiff:
Natalie F. Tham
Defendant:
V.T.A.C. General Contractors, Inc. and Ricardo Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vasquez v. Well Hung Drywall, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02694
Plaintiff:
Cirilo Juarez Vasquez
Defendant:
Well Hung Drywall, LLC and Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vasquez v. USA - 2255
as 8:2017cv02325
Plaintiff:
Omar Vasquez
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Benitez et al v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2017cv01462
Plaintiff:
Jose Arturo Benitez , Bladimiro Lopez Velasquez and Mario Antonio Ramos Vasquez
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
