Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roy v. AT&T et al
as 1:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
K.K.K. Roy
Defendant:
AT&T, Verizon Inc., All B.O.E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Fair v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06130
Plaintiff:
Avon E. Fair
Defendant:
Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon, Inc. and Verizon, et al
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331
Peterson v. Verizon, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01087
Plaintiff:
Naomi Peterson
Defendant:
Verizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Williams v. II Criminal Justice System et al
as 1:2010cv00149
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams
Respondent:
II Criminal Justice System, Radermacher, Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Criminal Justice System et al
as 1:2010mc00011
Petitioner:
Jomo Williams, Those Simarly Situated, Peo. of N.Y.S. and others
Respondent:
Criminal Justice System, OFC. Radermacher, OFC. Wagner and others
Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Verizon, Inc.
as 1:2008cv04309
Plaintiff:
Educational Credit Management Corporation
Defendant:
Verizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv03060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2008cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
