Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Krumdieck v. Coinbase, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09556
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krumdieck
Defendant:
COINBASE, INC, COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., Verizon Communications Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 FCA-Wire or Radio Communications (Mobile Services)
Cellco Partnership et al v. Town of Saugerties, New York et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless and Tarpon Towers II, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Saugerties, New York, The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Saugerties, New York, The Planning Board of the Town of Saugerties, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Advantage Communications, Inc. et al v. Verizon New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Advantage Communications, Inc., Kayson Communications and Global Network Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New York Inc and New York State Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Advantage Communications, Inc. et al v. Verizon New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Advantage Communications, Inc., Kayson Communications and Global Network Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New York, Inc. and New York State Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Best Payphones, Inc. v. Verizon New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11027
Plaintiff:
Best Payphones, Inc.
Defendant:
Verizon New York, Inc. and New York State Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FritzCo LLC et al v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10432
Plaintiff:
FritzCo LLC, Los Gatos-Saratoga Community Education and Recreation and The Law Office of Samuel M. Smith
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc. and Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC v. City of Hudson, New York et al
as 1:2021cv00774
Plaintiff:
Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
City of Hudson, New York, The Planning Board of the City of Hudson, New York, The Code Enforcement Department of the City of Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
New York SMSA Limited Partnership v. The Town of Bedford et al
as 7:2021cv03742
Defendant:
The Town of Bedford Planning Board, The Town of Bedford Town Board, Alberto Ciraco, Building Inspector and others
Plaintiff:
New York SMSA Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless
Intervenor Defendant:
John Santos, Jeremy Randol, Jesse Randol and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Villella et al v. Logan et al
as 7:2020cv09905
Plaintiff:
Richard O. Villella, Courtney S. Tarpley, Michael I. Olshakoski and others
Defendant:
New Cingular Wireless PCD LLC d/b/a AT&T doing business as AT&T, Homeland Towers, LLC, Douglas W. Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gondolfo et al v. Town of Carmel et al
as 7:2020cv09060
Plaintiff:
Joseph Armisto, Gerard Hanrahan, Jessica Gondolfo and others
Defendant:
Michael Carnazza (in his official capacity as Town of Carmel Building Inspector), Town of Carmel Planning Board, Town of Carmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
